Plaintiff was denied access to a jury trial and court discovery violating his seventh amendment rights through the courts inappropriate application of the D.C. Anti-SLAPP Statute.

Plaintiffs cases were dismissed with Prejudice under the D.C. Anti-SLAPP Statute, State Appellate Court denied request to hear appeal, denying Plaintiff access to further discovery and access to any other State courts within the United States.

Small Claims Judge Bosier applied the DC Anti- SLAPP in a $10,000 small claims case, review Judge Epstein declined to review decision and Judge Puig-Lugo cited the application of the DC Anti-SLAPP Statute in the small claims case as the primary reasons he was dismissing a $482,000,000 lawsuit with prejudice, (same Plaintiff)

"Can a State court deny access to a jury trial and court discovery through the inappropriate application on an Anti- SLAPP statute?"

"Can a State Court use their Anti-SLAPP Statute to deny a plaintiff their seventh amendment right to a jury trial and their fourteenth amendment right to the taking of property?"

Can a State court deny access to a jury trial and court discovery through the inappropriate application on an AntiSLAPP statute?