No. 21-6860
Lanny Jay Lyerla, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-law court-correction due-process harmless-error judicial-error manifest-injustice plain-error procedural-fairness witness-testimony
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Oua aoAr©/\ court cao^z-5 a Uirivtle$.s err^<r +© become c<
is 4^ere £>r -Ke <^^^;t_+o_a^L 4o "k'te cojrf
aryj Uxye 4liK ^Uuvn ^rr^r corr^ crt<xi_3 >© • >
■c<A IcuwO OKRA'S, Uo^O
^c?r i*V 4t> be reNii«AAi«ci cx^ci co rre^AeA .\l 5 cx OcO cxm error
^Ao^rA tae^t! i 4xxb?\e 4odiA _ _
AL| uuW^A ^CN/eA^eci bf (HwmW«, error} ^ corr*^^ |
Co o fA pe^ose Ao A 1ce ;Q bIcx»a e^rror—_? c?et> i
e'ju'^As E^?
o
Ox A <x•^CCCv
?vjWa o c*. error Pev^^eco ©
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When an action of the court causes a harmless error to become plain error, is there due process for the defendant to apply to the court?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Lanny Lyerla
Lanny Jay Lyerla Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent