No. 21-6858

Dalton Laquane Smith v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 851 922(g) 922(g)-conviction acca armed-career-criminal-act career-offender first-step-act government-concession rehaif sentencing-enhancement supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. In light of the Court& Government concessions(twice ) that
the petitioner never servedover a year,should the ACCA,851
removed in wake of theand Career Offender enhancement be
First Step Act Sec 401 and FirstStep Implmentation Act?

2. In .light of the Rehaif/Greer/Gary trio,
concessions ,can the 922(g) conviction
Vacated?and the governments
stand or should it be

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the ACCA, 851, and Career Offender enhancements should be removed in light of the First Step Act Section 401 and the First Step Implementation Act concessions that the petitioner never served over a year

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Dalton Laquane Smith
Dalton Laquane Smith — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent