1. Whether the court of appeals erred when deciding that a 2-hour trial "chess clock" did not violate Petitioner's due process rights, because Petitioner did show harm suffered by the time limits when the state court did not allow Petitioner to complete examination of Respondent; did not allow Petitioner to testify in his own case; and did not allow Petitioner to call rebuttal witnesses to Respondent's testimony.

Whether the court of appeals erred in deciding that a 2-hour trial 'chess clock' did not violate Petitioner's due process rights