No. 21-6831
Albert L. Richardson, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability drug-effects habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment taped-interrogation
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Could reasonable jurists find ineffective an attorney's failure to investigate the identity and effects of a drug administered to an accused at the time of a taped statement to police?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Albert L. Richardson
Mohammed Ahmed — Federal Public Defender's Office E.D. Mo., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent