Question #1: Did U.S. District Court and/or Fifth Circuit err by misconstru
ing Rule 60(b) as a federal habeas and time-barring petition
without allowing equitable tolling and/or Certificate of Appeal-
ability (COA) upon newly discovered suppressed evidence/infor
mation impeding postconviction-relief proceeding on unlitigated,
meritorious claim(s) and unconstitutional denial of 5th Amend
ment abd denial of Due Process under the 14th Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution?

Question #2: Was retained attorney ineffective for failure to object to forged
invalid charging instrument that had no signature from Grand
Jury Foreman?

Did U.S. District Court and/or Fifth Circuit err by misconstruing Rule 60(b) as a federal habeas and time-barring petition without allowing equitable tolling and/or Certificate of Appealability (COA) upon newly discovered suppressed impeding proceeding on unlitigated, meritorious claim(s) and unconstitutional denial of 5th Amendment abd denial of Due Process under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?