No. 21-68
Brendon Janis v. United States
Tags: constitutional-delegation delegation-of-authority due-process probation-officer risk-notification sentencing-guidelines supervised-release vagueness vagueness-doctrine
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does Standard Condition 12 unconstitutionally delegate authority to the probation officer?
2. Is Standard Condition 12 unconstitutionally vague?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Standard Condition 12 unconstitutionally delegate authority to the probation officer?
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-22
Reply of petitioner Brendon Janis filed.
2021-10-18
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-09-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 18, 2021.
2021-09-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 17, 2021 to October 18, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 17, 2021.
2021-08-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 18, 2021 to September 17, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 18, 2021)
Attorneys
Brendon Janis
Adam G. Unikowsky — Jenner & Block LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent