1. DID THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT AND/OR DISTRICT OF INDIANA—SOUTH BEND DIVISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT ERR IN DENYING RYAN'S § 2255 HABEAS CORPUS PETITION WITHOUT HOLDING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING?

II. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR AND/OR ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN APPLYING A LOCAL RULE "TO PURPOSEFULLY NOT REVIEW OR CONSIDER RYAN'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF § 2255 HABEAS CORPUS PETITION, AFFIDAVIT, AND NEW EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO EXPAND THE RECORD?

III. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR AND/OR ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN MISAPPLYING THE RULES FOR ANALYSIS DICTATED BY FEDERAL LAW, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, 104 S. CT. 2052, 89 L.ED. 2D 47 (1984) AND NOT CONSIDERING THE OVER FORTY EXAMPLES?

IV. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR AND/OR ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN STATING THAT EVIDENCE "THAT WAS NOT PRESENTED TO A JURY WAS NOT EVIDENCE"?

V. DID THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS (APPELLATE COURT) ERR AND/OR ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN STATING THAT IT "DID NOT SEE" THE RELEVANT CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS OF THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS BY THE DISTRICT COURT AND DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY?

VI. SHOULD THE JUDICIARY BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE TO DISREGARD AND DECLINE CONTRARY TO BINDING COURTS' DISREGARD NEW EVIDENCE AND SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL CLAIMS, MISREPRESENTED FACTS IN LEGAL DOCUMENTS HARBORING A FALSE NARRATIVE, AND FURTHER ENFORCE A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE?

VII. SHOULD ACTUAL INNOCENCE CLAIM AFFECT COURT REVIEW?

Whether the district court erred in denying Ryan's § 2255 habeas corpus petition without holding an evidentiary hearing