AdministrativeLaw HabeasCorpus Punishment Privacy
1. Did the Court Error in ruling that "the complaint failed
to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)?
2. Did the Court Error in ruling that "Plaintiff, instead
makes several conclusory, fantastical, and nonsensical allegations,
which are insufficient to state a constitution claim, in light of
the FACT that on December 30, 2020 (Appendix A.) Hedrick's conviction
was overturned (VACATED) by the United States Court of Appeals for
the Fifth Circuit?
3. Did the Court Error in ruling to dismiss "...plaintiff's
claims arising at the Federal Correctional Institution Fort Dix,
for improper venue." when in fact the assaults on Hedrick occured
at all facilities that Hedrick has bean incarcerated at since FCI Victorville to and including FCI Fort Dix.
4. Was the Bureau of Prisons ("B0P") in DEFAULT of its
Administrative Remedies Program (aka 8,9,1.0,11, tort claim) system
by "failing to respond" in accordance with the Programs "TIME
LIMITS" to respond to. Hedrick's complaints?
5. Did the Court violate Hedrick's Eighth Amendment rights
to "access to the courts" and was Hedrick subjected to "cruel and
unusual punishment" with "deliberate indifference" by the BOP officer's who are the subject matter of Hedrick's BP-8, BP-9, .BP-10,
BP-11 and Tort Claim for Default Judgement?
Did the Court Error in ruling that the 'complaint failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)?