No. 21-6771
Charles Reddicks v. Massachusetts
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-records equal-protection fourteenth-amendment impartial-jury jury-selection race-neutral racial-discrimination sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-02-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether permitting the Government to run criminal records for
potential jurors, then use the records of the record check to strike
jurors of color, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment and the right to an impartial jury under the Sixth
Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether permitting the Government to run criminal records for potential jurors, then use the records of the record check to strike jurors of color, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the right to an impartial jury under the Sixth Amendment
Docket Entries
2022-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Massachusetts to respond filed.
2021-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Charles Reddicks
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Anna E. Lumelsky — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent