No. 21-6767
Bryce Clair Clark v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the court in applying point eroe enhanciment for having 3 altered with an numbers re chary read?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Bryce C. Clark
Bryce Clair Clark — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent