1. Are U.S. Courts and the SUPREME COURT really operating as "ARTICLE III"
they operating under the CONSTITUTION, or under the U.S. are
the UNITED NATIONS ' "INTERNATIONAL of CONSTITUTION
FEDERAL JUDGES through unified ASSOCIATION OF JUDGES "
ASSOCIATION membership to the IAJ via UNITED STATES judges '
membership in the FJA? Either way, can U.S. judges continue to treat repeated
victim" Reports about an "attempted murdef, and " whistleblower
Statements about criminal coverups by "government servants of the"crime
EXECUTIVE and JUDICIAL branches in 11
" with blanket immunity ' for "the Accused ' and " without providing any cases,
meaningful investigation whatsoever' into any of the CIVIL claims and
CRIMINAL allegations? If so. how is this so. when both JUDICIAL and
EXECUTIVE officers have OATHS OF RESPONSIBILY and FIDUCIARY
DUTIES, and are being paid by American " Taxpayer^ ' to act with accountability
to address FACTS, EVIDENCE, and CLAIMS against their failures to
act constitutionally and in accordance with the Public Trust?

2. Notwithstanding Affidavit(s) of Truth concerning the FACTS, EVIDENCE and
CLAIMS of #1 above, is not a proclaimed "long time target' of government
retaliation and an attempted murder resulting in amputations of both legs and all
but a single pinky finger on a non-dominant hand - being one who continues to be
targeted to such extent as to being thereafter criminally EVICTED WITHOUT
DUE PROCESS during the deathly cold of a Michigan winter, during a COVID
PANDEMIC, and during an EVICTION MORATORIUM - entitled to proper
" accesd' to the UNITED STATES courts after finding refuge from homelessness
bona fide "REFUGEE," and once settled in another State? If not, why not as a
given the conditions of #1 above concerning OATHS and DUTIES ?

3. Notwithstanding a plethora of Affidavit(s) of Truth(s) concerning the FACTS,
EVIDENCE and CLAIMS of both #1 and #2 above, is not Certiorari warranted
when UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT "judgefs}' assigned to the case(s)
have written a prim a facie fraudulent "judgment[s}' and other convoluted and
erroneous documents that not only DISMISSES the entire case(s), but also goes
so far as to summarily deny a "forma pauperis" and "recently totally and
permanently disabled quad-amputee " any "access" whatsoever to the "Electronic
fEM/ECF]Filina' System ", and similarly denying all requested formal "Service of
by the U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE upon the named CO- Process "
case(s); and the captioned TRUSTEES/RESPONDANTS to
thus, COMPLETELY DENIES ACCESS to a sovereign America man deemed
otherwise protected from such disparaging and unequal treatment under the U.S.
CONSTITUTION, Human Rights Laws, and Civil Rights Laws designed to protect
and provide "equal treatment ' to the "disabled' , the "poof', and the "elderly', as
BENEFICIARY-RELATOR David Schied is one of the Sovereign American People
and as a former " Taxpavefl If not, why not when JUDICIAL officers have
OATHS

Are U.S. courts operating under the Constitution or the UN's International Association of Judges?