WHETHER AN OPEN-AIR SNIFF CONDUCTED BY A POLICE K9 (DOG) TRAINED IN DRUG DETECTION, ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WITHOUT A SEARCH WARRANT OR PROBABLE CAUSE, CONSTITUTES A SEARCH WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 4th AND 14th AMENDMENTS. FL. S. CT. V. JARDINES 133 SCT 1409 (2013), ''THE GOVERNMENT USE OF A TRAINED POLICE DOG TO INVESTIGATE A HOME AND ITS IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS IS A USE SEARCH WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE 4th AMENDMENT.

Whether an open-air sniff conducted by a police K9 on private property without a warrant or probable cause constitutes a search