No. 21-6721

Tyrone Anderson v. Delaware

Lower Court: Delaware
Docketed: 2021-12-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment confrontation-clause due-process fair-trial hearsay ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction standard-of-review trial-counsel
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does it Constitute Ineffective Assistance of Counsel to Fail to object to a statement From the state's Chief Witness who claimed that a Non-Testifying Declarant and Stated that the defendant was in Fact 6th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution Article 1, Section 7 of the Delaware Constitution, Hearsay (DRE 801 and DRE 802) Which Prohibits the Introduction of Prior Bad acts Under Circumstances Like those that are Present in this case?

Did it Constitute Ineffective Assistance of Counsel For Trial Counsel to Fail to Object or Seek to Modify an Order of the Court which Prevented him from Providing Identifying Information to the defendant about witnesses to the Alleged Crimes and Prevented Counsel himself From contacting Directly Or Indirectly any witnesses to the Alleged Crimes?

For Defense Counsel to fail to Request a hearing Pursuant to Deberry v. State, Del 457 A.2d 744 (1983). When there was clear Uncontradicted Evidence that an Audio Recording which was Attempted to be done by The State Malfunctioned During the majority Part of an Alleged Recording of one of the crimes For which the defendant was Convicted?

Did it Constitute Ineffective Assistance of Counsel to Fail to Request A hearing to Determine the Identity of a Confidential Informant Pursuant to State v. Flowers, Del Super 316 A.2d 564 (1973) When that Confidential Informant Possessed Exculpatory Information For the defense and was an Actor in the Alleged Crime which the state Alleged occurred?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does it constitute ineffective assistance of counsel to fail to object to a state's chief witness's testimony that a non-testifying declarant stated the defendant was in fact committing the crimes for which he was on trial, in violation of the 6th and 14th Amendments

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 24, 2022)

Attorneys

Tyrone Anderson
Tyrone Anderson — Petitioner