Under the Mandatory Victim s Restitution Act, when an offense does
not involve as an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal
activity, can a court look to the parties' mutual understanding of an underlying scheme to impose restitution beyond the loss resulting from the
conduct related to the count of conviction?

Whether a court can impose restitution beyond the loss resulting from the conduct related to the count of conviction under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act when the offense does not involve a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity