1) MR BAKER WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS RIGHTS BECAUSE OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS SUBSTITUTING THEIR OWN CONCEPTS OF LAW OF DUE PROCESS

2) MR. BAKER AVERS THAT VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN

3) MR. BAKER WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF DUE PROCESS BY THE U.S.D.C. IN ITS INORDINATE DELAY TO ANSWER 28 USCO 2254 FLAW WITHIN LAW OF DUE PROCESS THERE IS NO WRITE TIME LINE IN THE LAW OF A PRO SO LITIGANT IN HAVING A MEANINGFUL TIME TO PREPARE A DEFENSE: MOST ARE RUSHED TO TRIAL

5) MR. BAKER WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PROCESS

6) MR. BAKER WAS DEPRIVING HIS RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS BY NOT TAKEN BEFORE A JUDGE TO BE FOND NATURE OF CHARGE TO BE GIVEN HIS MIRANDA RIGHTS OR TO HAVE A BOND PLACED.

7) MR. BAKER'S WAS DEPRIVE OF HIS DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WHEN TRIAL PROSECUTOR AND STAND-BY COUNSEL TALKED ABOUT HIS PAST HISTORY AMONG THE POTENTIAL JUROR'S OUTSIDE THE COURTROOM.

8) MR BAKER WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE COUNSEL ON MULTIPLE LEVELS

9) TRIAL PROSECUTOR'S MISCONDUCT BEFORE AND DURING TRIAL

10) CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS OCCURRED WHEN TRIAL JUDGE FAILED IN HIS DUTY TO PROTECT A DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

11) MR. BAKER WAS CONVICTED IN PART BY JURY TAMPERING

12) MR BAKER WAS DENIED A FAIR AND JUST TRIAL IN TRIAL COURTS DENIAL OF A CONTINUANCE.

Whether the state courts' dismissal of the petitioner's due process claims violated the Fourteenth Amendment