No. 21-6676
Mario Murillo-Mora v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability circuit-court district-court due-process garza-v-idaho habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review precedent-interpretation roe-v-flores-ortega
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Circuit Courts of Appeals can Properly Summarily Deny Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability to a Habeas Petitioner when the District Court Has Declined to Engage in the Ineffective-Assistance Analysis Required Under this Court's Precedent in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000) and Garza v. Idaho, 189 S. Ct. 738 (2019).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Circuit Courts of Appeals can Properly Summarily Deny Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability to a Habeas Petitioner
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2022)
Attorneys
Mario Murillo-Mora
Bradley Price — Price Law, PLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent