Whether the majority opinion erred not only as to the substantive admissibility
of the other acts evidence, but whether the majority also erred procedurally in relying
on a theory of admissibility that the prosecution strategically waived at trial, the
waiver at which the defense relied on in formulating its own strategy. Whether
the reappointment order was reversible error. The court determined a sufficient
conflict existed, therefore the court was required to relieve trial counsel, and trial
counsel could not properly be reappointed. Whether the prosecutor 's closing argument
violated petitioner 's state and federal due process rights. Whether hearsay was
improperly admitted by victims father.

Whether the majority opinion erred not only as to the substantive admissibility of the other acts evidence, but whether the majority also erred procedurally in relying on a theory of admissibility that the prosecution strategically waived at trial