No. 21-6634
Roy Cornell Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: assistance-of-counsel constitutional-right constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit-standard ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se-representation right-to-counsel sentencing sentencing-stage
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was the Petitioner afforded his Constitutional Right to accurate assistance of Counsel in his sentencing stage.
2. Did Petitioner fail to prosecute his case considering the standard measured by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Petitioner afforded his Constitutional Right to accurate assistance of Counsel in his sentencing stage
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Roy Johnson
Roy Cornell Johnson — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent