No. 21-6617

Alan Douglas v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-15
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: american-heart-association civil-rights civil-rights-violation drug-eluted-stents due-process judicial-bias judicial-misconduct medical-malpractice procedural-error res-ipsa-loquitur
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. The Relief Sought - Reverse and Settle Personal Injury [ 9th Circuit FRAP 21(a)(2)(B)(i)]

II. The issues (The Questions Presented for Review) [9th Circuit FRAP 21(a)(2)(B)(ii)]
See below [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and [7].

[1] Appellant's US Constitutional and Civil Rights Violation [CRV];

[2] Reverse Judgment issued on Feb.19, 2019 in favor of Timothy J. Daskivich, MD by TJ;

[3] Reverse Judgment issued on Feb.14, 2019 in favor of CSMC by TJ in LASC;

[4] Reverse Judgment [Demurrer] issued on Jan. 18, 2019 in favor of Nancy Zimmerman, NP and Jay Neal Schapira, MD by TJ in LASC: Anti-Constitutional-not allowed to proceed in Federal Court,

[5] Court Order for AWARD based on Documents presented, which is just and proper;

[6] Reassignment the Cases to Settlement Court [USCA-Mediation Dept.] if No Award is granted;

[7] Reverse, remand, reassignment and Trial Judge Disqualification based on plain ERRORS, bias with gross prejudice, willful misconduct and adverse personal reaction with harassment.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Reverse and settle personal injury

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Alan Douglas
Alan Douglas — Petitioner