No. 21-6608
Wilfredo Torres v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights cointelpro domestic-assassinations domestic-surveillance due-process ethics judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether U.S. Judge Edgardo Ramos and U.S. Magistrate-Judge Katharine Parker violated
rules of ethics and my right to due process of law when they lied (case 19CV6332-docket 138)
to grant a fifteen (15) months stay to defendants of the Deep State-CIA-FBI COINTELPRO
domestic assassinations program who routinely carry-out warrantless raids of my apartment to
kill me. Exhibit 1.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether U.S. Judge Edgardo Ramos and U.S. Magistrate-Judge Katharine Parker violated rules of ethics and my right to due process of law
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent The City of New York to respond filed.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2022)
Attorneys
The City of New York
John David Moore — New York City Law Department, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Wilfredo Torres
Wilfredo Torres — Petitioner