No. 21-6597

Jason Whren v. United States

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-12-14
Status: Granted
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: d-c-code-23-110 exceptional-circumstances hill-v-lockhart ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia failed to apply the applicable standards in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), and Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985), to determine if a plea is knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. What, when a defense attorney lied to his client, misled by his client to accept a plea, he never should have accepted?

Also, whether the Court of Appeals failed to apply the applicable standards in Murray v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1 (1989), and McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467 (1991), in determining whether a D.C. Code § 23-110 Motion is appropriate for defendants that were prevented by their issues and demonstrate that they accepted guilty circumstances from raising at the proper time?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court of Appeals failed to apply the applicable standards

Docket Entries

2022-03-28
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-02-04
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-10
Application (21A182) to file petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of page limits granted by The Chief Justice. The petition for a writ of certiorari may not exceed 60 pages.
2021-05-24
Application (21A182) to file petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of page limits, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2021-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2022)

Attorneys

Jason Whren
Jason Whren — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent