John Oirya v. Brigham Young University
AdministrativeLaw ERISA DueProcess Immigration
1. Should this Court amend its holding in Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 579 (1975), and require federal courts to review the disciplinary decision of a school for the existence of substantial evidence of guilt against the accused party?
2. Should this Court amend its holdings in Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326 (1975) and Davis v. Monroe County Bd. of Educ., 526 U.S. 629, 648 (1999), and grant federal courts the mandate to set aside a school's disciplinary decision that is found to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, contrary to law and/or unsupported by substantial evidence of guilt against the accused party?
Should federal courts review school disciplinary decisions for substantial evidence of guilt?