No. 21-6550

Wade Lay v. Aboutanaa El Habti, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 8th-amendment appellate-procedure civil-liberties civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure death-penalty due-process execution judicial-discretion standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether a prisoner may appeal to the United States Supreme Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1254 to contest his grounds under the Correct Constitution, regarding the extreme peril of those circumstances whenever the execution of a prisoner, resulting in an alleged violation of the United States Constitution, the case involving matters suitable to this Court's jurisdiction.

Whether the Supreme Court covers the United States, in a capital case, on the basis and procedure to receive the state, to determine the constitutionality of execution protocol be followed to investigate the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure, the circumstance, case law, and the state and federal statutes to cross the prematurely execution of an particular prisoner, whose constitutional deliberation then before Court may go.

Whether those prisoners be left in the dark, void of information that is prohibited to all other parties in a proceeding pending in court, and characterized individual who is then deprived of the right competent, to show cause execution to provide a legal discourse such as that presented by the Court concerning the rights where of execution.

Whether those prisoners with a right to perfect case be ruled under equal process as is coming in the adjudication of a crime, and/or the federal public defender, etc., especially a prisoner from was in execution date.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the execution protocol used by the State of Oklahoma violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-06
Brief of respondent Aboutanaa El Habti, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-11-12
Supplemental brief of petitioner Wade Lay filed.
2021-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Aboutanaa El Habti, et al.
Bryan Gregg ClevelandOklahoma Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Wade Lay
Wade Lay — Petitioner