No. 21-653
Harold Lee Harvey, Jr. v. Florida
Relisted (2)
Tags: autonomy-right counsel-override criminal-defense criminal-procedure defendant-autonomy due-process first-degree-murder ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mccoy-v-louisiana sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Punishment HabeasCorpus Privacy
Punishment HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the Sixth Amendment autonomy right established in McCoy violated where counsel overrode an express agreement with the defendant to not concede guilt to first-degree murder, and did so without any notice to the defendant, leaving the defendant no realistic opportunity to object?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Sixth Amendment autonomy right established in McCoy violated where counsel overrode an express agreement with the defendant to not concede guilt to first-degree murder, and did so without any notice to the defendant, leaving the defendant no realistic opportunity to object?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-18
Record received from the Supreme Court of Florida. The record is electronic.
2022-01-04
Record Requested.
2021-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-21
Reply of petitioner Harold Lee Harvey, Jr. filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-03
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2021-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Harold Lee Harvey, Jr.
Ross Benjamin Bricker — Jenner & Block LLP, Petitioner