No. 21-6521
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review burden-of-proof constitutional-provisions court-filing due-process hallucinogenic-drug judicial-process legal-document procedural-rules reasons-for-granting-writ scotus-petition victim-testimony
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
ms Due, Peocm o_ausl
PPQQP msEX \1 TOv.
DPlX DVilQEkJCb \DEVnivl\bb T\Ab
PbirDDbb AS Tvlb DUbOTbb '\5
Tib Vi Cum 5 TX5T\<v\OkJf iDDo
DDlA TbSIPlEO lb libi^D f\
PftELUdlPObEbic, iDllUG PCiob
lb Tib SiAcofibS. ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause requires the burden of proof to be met if the only evidence justifying the petitioner as the shooter is the victim's testimony who did not testify to using a hallucinogenic drug prior to the shooting
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent Mississippi to respond filed.
2021-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 5, 2022)
Attorneys
Jamar Allen
Jamar Allen — Petitioner
Mississippi