Did an appellate court contravene Supreme Court precedent by granting the government's motion for summary disposition when prior decisions of this Court, as well as lower Court decisions on nearly identical questions of law, establish that a defendant's request is (at least) debatable among reasonable jurists and in fact presented a 'substantial question' on instant appeal? See: Garcia v. Davis, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192801, *35 (S.D. Texas, Nov. 13, 2018), Weaver v. Massachusetts, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), and Jordan v. Fisher, 135 S. Ct. 2647, (2015).

Did an appellate court contravene Supreme Court precedent by granting the government's motion for summary disposition?