1. Mating the real criticality of this Special—totally deny ONLY petitioner (Mr. Schneider) Gay and all ACLU access to Court record on appeal ANY copies of the November 15, 2019 hearing Transcript AND copies of Proof of Service for appeal Court record AND ANY copies of inter aliq respondents appellate Opposition brief(s) and Proofs of Service?

2. Was it a Structural Error and Unlawful for respondents to NEVER serve petitioner with ANY copies of inter aliq their appellate opposition brief(s) and Proofs of Service on July 13, 2021 in the California Third Appellate Court? 9 A.K. Ofc. When "Repeated[ly]" explicitly asked by Schneider?

3. Was it systematic and knowing refusal by the California Supreme Court to how OR copy OR even display on ANY computer action ANY documents filed electronically by petitioner Schneider, point of entry for the California Supreme Court to retroactively—and without any notice—delete "rehearing" process that altered the fact Schneider had no opportunity or notice Hatfully Motel by Writ 46-47 5 And?

4. Can U. Schneider be freed like a "habeas Corpus" Convicted Prisoner "From Paul" October 7, 2021 Are the Constitutional Considerations of Jurisdiction, and ranaa Tue aaa FT PEI—II speech, Caucus le Intact Blur, and leben national Eaglienabld HUMAN RIGHTS implicated by every aspect of this Case?

Whether the California courts violated the Petitioners' fundamental due process rights by explicitly citing federal law and issues that directly involved the California courts enacting orders/opinions those courts made