No. 21-6497
Hye-Young Park v. Colin S. Bruce
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: alternative-remedies due-process false-statements federal-rules federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure judicial-act judicial-immunity judicial-process
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Whether a judge knowingly replacing facts with false statements is a judicial act, which is a function normally performed by a judge.
(2) Whether judicial immunity is available when a judge's acts led to a judicial result that precludes all resort to judicial remedies to a litigant.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a judge knowingly replacing facts with false statements is a judicial act
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Hye-Young Park
Hye-Young Park — Petitioner