1) WHETHER THE MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE VIOLATED PETITIONER'S SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BY APPLYING A NEW PAROLE STATUTE, SECTION 558.019.4(2) RSMo, IN CALCULATING PETITIONER'S PAROLE ELGIBILITY, AND EXTENDING PETITIONER'S PAROLE ELGIBILITY FROM 2005 TO 2075 OR 2080.

2) AND, WHETHER THE BOARD COMMITTED FRAUD IN BOTH THE TRIAL COURT AND APPELLATE COURT, DECLATORY JUDGMENT PROCEEDINGS, BY ASSERTING THAT PETITIONER'S PAROLE ELGIBILITY WAS PROPERLY CALCULATED UNDER SECTION 558.019.4(2) 75-YEAR RULE and two MISSOURI CASES THAT HAD NOT YET BEEN DECIDED.

3) AND, WHETHER PETITIONER WAS ENTITLED TO A HEARING IN THE APPELLATE COURT AND MISSOURI SUPREME COURT, ONCE HE PAID THE FILING FEES, IN FULL, ONLY TO HAVE HIS PETITIONS SUMMARILY DENIED BY BOTH COURTS.

4) PETITIONER WAS ENTITLED TO BE HEARD ON WHETHER OR NOT THE BOARD WAS IN_COMPLIANCE WITH STATE STATUTE.

Whether the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole violated petitioner's substantive due process rights