No. 21-6478
IFP
Tags: caniglia-v-strom community-caretaking exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment police-entry reasonable-belief suicide-intervention warrantless-entry warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment
FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
The police forcibly entered Merid's apartment without a warrant claiming a reasonable basis to conclude that Merid was suicidal and needed assistance despite the fact that Merid told them through a closed door he was fine. The police had no concerns that Merid had committed a crime or had weapons and knew that he lived alone. The question presented is whether that entry and, after rendering aid to Merid, the subsequent warrantless search of a closed room of the apartment violated the Fourth Amendment and the principles recently announced by this Court in Caniglia v. Strom, 141 S. Ct. 1596 (2021).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the warrantless entry and search of Merid's apartment violated the Fourth Amendment
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Endalkachew Merid
Jonathan P. Sheldon — Sheldon & Flood, PLC, Petitioner