No. 21-6469
IFP
Tags: cause-and-prejudice constitutional-claims counsel-ineffectiveness criminal-procedure evidentiary-hearing prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1). Whether the District Court overlooked Constitutional Claims and
Cause and Prejudice.
2). Whether petitioner was intitled to an Evidentiary Hearing due
to Counsel's failure to Acknowledge nor Deny Constitutional Rights.
3). Whether the United States Court of Appeals Overlooked
Constitutional violations.
4). Whether Petitioner's Sixth Amendment was violated due to
counsel's cumulative misrepresentation.
5). Whether Prosecutorial Misconduct is procedurally barred due to:
(A). The showing of off and on the record violations, (b) The
showing of Cause and Prejudice, (c) Rule 470.05(c) of the Criminal
procedure law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court overlooked Constitutional Claims and Cause and Prejudice
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Glen Campbell
Glen Campbell — Petitioner