No. 21-6463

William Martin Cresham v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-11-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure domestic-violence due-process evidence evidence-law prior-acts propensity propensity-evidence
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

This case presents the question this Court acknowledged was "left open" in Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 75, fn. 5 (1991): "whether a state law would violate the Due Process Clause if it permitted the use of 'prior crimes' evidence [in this case domestic violence evidence] to show propensity to commit a charged crime."

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the admission of prior acts of domestic violence to establish the petitioner's propensity to commit such crimes violated his right to due process

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2021-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2021)

Attorneys

California
Scott Alan TaryleDepartment of Justice, Respondent
William Cresham
Alex Nicholas CoolmanThe Law Office of Alex Coolman, Petitioner