No. 21-6446
Khongsana Soumphonphakdy v. Mary J. Walilko, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2022-01-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
What would 'THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' do to help people in a case like this?
Can 'THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' make a change for statute of limitations laws?
And Can 'THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' direct the mistake to the lower Court?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions
Docket Entries
2022-01-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent Mary J. Walilko, et al. to respond filed.
2021-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Khongsana Soumphonphakdy
Khongsanga Soumphonphakdy — Petitioner
Mary J. Walilko, et al.
Khongsana Soumphonphady — Pro Se, Respondent