No. 21-643
Tags: criminal-jurisdiction due-process indian-country mcgirt-v-oklahoma native-american-rights overruling-precedent
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
2. Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-08-01
MANDATE ISSUED
2022-06-30
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-16
Brief of respondent Bryce Miller in opposition filed.
2021-12-16
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Bryce Miller.
2021-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 16, 2021.
2021-12-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 2, 2021 to December 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-22
Brief amicus curiae of Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma filed.
2021-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2021)
Attorneys
Bryce Miller
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner