ISSUES RAISED IN PETITONERS HABEAS WHICH CUUID OF BEEN RASED ON DIRECT APPEAL. THIS FIDIN'G ON ITS OWN SHOUID SUFFICE A VALID CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSE AS JOIN JONES AND MATT MIKVA'S APPEA STRATEEY EXCLUSIVETY ARFVED, "SUFFICIENCY IF EVIDENE."

WHICH COULD OF BEEN RAISED ON APPEAL, FHEKE ARE FOUR OTHER OBVIOUS EKRORS WHICH WERE NETTHER RAISED ON APPEAL NOR THEY INCLUDED IN PETTTONERS HABEAS, DVE TO BIENE NERE IHSIDE THE RECORD," WAICH INCLUDED:

1) THE COURTS ERROR AT TRIA OF "STOPPING-THE-DEFENSESHORT" OF FU EXIHAUSTION IN REGARES TO GONFRONTATION AGAINST DETECTIVE HYLTON IN VIOLATION. OF THE DEFEHDANTS

2) THE PREJUDICIAL AND DANGEROUS IMPAET OF THHE COURIS DECISION OF NOT ALOWINE 1HE JURY T VIEW A VIDED RECORDED INTERVIEW WIHICH MOST CERTAINIY EXPOSED CONTRADICTION OF "AT ISSUE" WOUID HAVE BETWELN THE DEFENOANT THAT OCCURRED EVIDENCE

3) PERJURY BY DETECTIVE HYLTON. COMMENTS OF MISREPRESENTTO TESTIMONY BY DETECTIVE THE VIDED RECORDED INTERVIEN ON AUGUSTqM 2O18, AND;

5) Z8-33, WHICH PROVES SOMEONE, MOST LIKILY ED BAWMAN, FRAUDULENT HREATENING TEXT MESSAGES MANUFACURED IN ORDER TO FRAME THE DEFENOANT

Whether the petitioner's writ of habeas corpus was properly denied