No. 21-6415
Terril Kinchen v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-04-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
IF THE DISTRICT COURT SENTENCED A DEFENDANT TO A AGREED PLEA AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARTIES, CAN THE DISTRICT COURT NOW DETERMINE THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT SENTENCE AS A CAREER OFFENDER BASED ON THE PLEA AGREEMENT?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of their First Amendment rights
Docket Entries
2022-04-04
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-02-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2021)
Attorneys
Terril Kinchen
Terril Kinchen — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent