I. DId ti co er WE pArED JUnE RESpNDET iN OUL
PEANER PROEDINGS WLCN 3ETITOER APALED C23E # 20159 CR14-1599
AND PROUED TO COOD TAT REPODET ETED RESIDMICE TO OTHER PARTY
AND MOS.LEAD PETITONE , BE IT NOTED THAT REMT NEUER LN TILE OF
PETITODS RSDIN J HONE ALLEDED WRITNE O OHERWISE NOTY
PEDTIONE IA HAD THAD ME LS BELID O N DEAULT O COWRAET DORLW
SIX NAL EARS PETTONE DWUED RESIDE ONLY AEL PESTONE OI ARESIE
DLD TUS OCCR AUD ONY AFER PETITJON FILED CIL ACTON APLNST RESPODEO.
BL IT FURTNEL DOTED THAT DUE TO FAC RESPONDENT IO LORMING
OAUE FULL POSSESSOD OF RESDUE BACK TO PETTIONE ON HAR 9 VEES
HE CUBARY L3 NOT DELIOUET ONPAUMENTS. THAT CDORDS SNOULD WAVE
DODE MORE AS PETITIONER PROUED ALTELDR MOTIUE AND DESCESTIE AOTONS
OF RESPOLDENT TO ATTAMPT TO RECIKU DOBLE PAMMEUTS FROM MULIPLE
,2
IRDVIDUALS DUR SONe JIME PERDD , CODET FANED TO EXERCISE LAWS
ESTADUBOED TO PROTEET PETITONER DURIL APPEAL PROCESS.
D COULDUP CAS CLIA48 PETITON SAULD BED ALDED
COUTPUANEE PERWS REQUEST AJ IT LS HISRIGAT AUD AOTION NELEAS
PURSOIN AS PERTIROT WTINES AS DO PRSENT AUD COBT AILED TO
FOPOENA, COORT FALED TO ALLDO PETTIONER DUE PROCESS DNDER
EDDSTITUTION AS RECOLDED JAR PADDE CAUS BETLOEED PETITIONR AAD
PMT LDULD CLEAR SAOWN DECRITON RESODET, AND HS

NOLAWAUL AOTS TO REET OBTAIO POSSESSTOJ OF RESIDNCE WXICN WE WAD
NO RIGAT TO DO. RESPONDEUT FURSNER ADMTS UUDER ORT
WEW ASR 1E HE DID REOT RESIDEUXE. WTH ALL PETTONEES POSSESSIONS
u
)j
U TACT HIS ANSOEL WAS" YES. WHAT MD DID CODET NED WAED
RESPOUDET JESFIED HE DID T, TO REUDE JODGEMEUT IN FAVOL Of PETTOUR?
ROT DiSRODACdOd AROD! DId In FnCT CODST VOlATe PETTODEES
DU POCESS S

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's due process claims and denying petitioner's right to possession of the property, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments