No. 21-6398
Roy M. Belfast v. M. Breckon, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-procedure judicial-review standing takings
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did The Anpellate Court Aid In The Violation Of The Powers Suspending The Writ of Habers Seperation, " :Corpus And Constitufiondl Avoidance Doctrine : Based Upon Failure To Huld A Evidenti2ry Hearing Concerning Of Justine Demunstrsting. 18 U.S.C.S 400l (2) 18 U.S.C.8 3624 18 U.5.C.8 32 5 U.S.C.s 702 Are Being Being Entorced Contrary lo Congressiwnal Intent.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Rope, Aly Covell, Bid to the Violation of the Equal Powers U.S. to the Writ of Certiorari?
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent M. Breckon, Warden to respond filed.
2021-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2021)
Attorneys
M. Breckon, Warden
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Roy M. Belfast
Roy M. Belfast — Petitioner