No. 21-6361
Marcus Crawley, aka Holyfield v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure davis-v-united-states due-process judicial-review plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
If a defendant pleaded guilty to a § 924(c) charge and a predicate crime of violence that is no longer valid after Davis, may a reviewing court search plea documents for evidence of another predicate to sustain the § 924(c) conviction when that predicate was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt or admitted to by the defendant?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a reviewing court may search plea documents for evidence of another predicate to sustain a § 924(c) conviction when that predicate was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt or admitted to by the defendant
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Marcus Crawley
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent