No. 21-6353
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts court-funding due-process equal-protection financial-status in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion legal-procedure post-conviction post-conviction-relief
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Did the Trial Court err in denying In Forma Pauperis funding for post-conviction services based upon Petitioner's financial status at the beginning of the prosecution (Jan, 2017) rather than the beginning of the post-conviction action (20:213) s
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Trial Court err in denying In Forma Pauperis funding based on financial status at start of prosecution rather than post-conviction action?
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-08
Waiver of right of respondent Minnesota to respond filed.
2021-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Minnesota
Stephen Allwine
Stephen Allwine — Petitioner