No. 21-635
Larry Fields v. Cincinnati, Ohio Police Department, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure magistrate-judge standing trial-fairness
Latest Conference:
2022-03-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the magistrate judge intended
violation of the federal rules of civil Procedure?
2. Whether petitioner constitutional rights where
violated?
3. Whether the defendants had an unfair
Advantage of the outcome of the trail?
4. Whether Larry was given due process clause of
the 14th amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the magistrate judge intended violation of the federal rules of civil Procedure?
Docket Entries
2022-03-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-28
Waiver of right of respondents Cincinnati Police Department, City of Cincinnati Citizen Complaint Authority, Cincinnati Police Records, et al. to respond filed.
2021-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Cincinnati Police Department, City of Cincinnati Citizen Complaint Authority, Cincinnati Police Records, et al.
Larry Fields
Larry Fields — Petitioner