WHETHER THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN THE MISSISSIPPI TRIAL COURT BY THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT WAS CLEARLY ERRONEOUS AND CONTRARY TO WELL ESTABLISHED COURT PRECEDENTS FOR THE DECADES AS WELL, HAST OVER FOUR.

WHETHER DOES THE FIFTH AMENDMENT EXCEPTION TO DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAIM, WHERE ACQUITTAL ON THE MERITS UPON RECORD IN THE PETITIONER BEING IN CUSTODY ON UNLAWFUL HOLD GOT BY 03S OF THE VIBRATION'S AMENDS, U.S.CA.

Whether the denial of petitioners' request for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment