1. The trial court refused to allow Petitioner to call a material
witness that could significantly aid in his defense -and complied
with the Rules Of Evidences. Did the Court of Appeals err by not
finding that Petitioner's Sixth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Rights were violated?

2. Whether the Court of Appeals failed to acknowledge that Petitioner
made the required plausible showing that the informant's testimony
may be important under Tex. R. Evid. 508(c)(2)?

3. Whether the Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinion was inconsistant
and/or contrary to the facts of the record?

Whether the trial court's refusal to allow the petitioner to call a material witness violated the petitioner's Sixth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment rights