No. 21-6326

Farand Skinner v. Kentucky

Lower Court: Kentucky
Docketed: 2021-11-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-rights due-process exculpatory-evidence fifth-amendment napue-v-illinois prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court-review
Latest Conference: 2022-01-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Did the Kentucky Supreme Court violate Mr. Skinner's rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and issue a decision contrary to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), and their progeny in refusing to find error in the prosecution's suppression and destruction of exculpatory evidence and the government's false testimony concerning the exculpatory evidence?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Kentucky Supreme Court violate Mr. Skinner's rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and issue a decision contrary to Brady-v-Maryland, Napue-v-Illinois, and their-progeny in refusing to find error in the prosecution's suppression-and-destruction-of-exculpatory-evidence, and the-government's-false-testimony-concerning-the-exculpatory-evidence?

Docket Entries

2022-01-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Farnad Skinner
Farand O. Skinner III — Petitioner