No. 21-6319
Eric Martinez v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
When federal law compels the use of state law to define and punish crime, and the state allows probation in lieu of a conviction, does federal law also allow it?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When federal law compels the use of state law to define and punish crime, and the state allows probation in lieu of a conviction, does federal law also allow it?
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-22
Reply of petitioner Eric Martinez filed. (Distributed)
2022-02-07
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-12-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 7, 2022.
2021-12-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 7, 2022 to February 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-08
Response Requested. (Due January 7, 2022)
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Eric Martinez
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent