© Are Vehrw/hen&fri
Un4er+he-Uiu
(5)Cun 38 U.St.Sec^^i beused teibutorl-Hve Ccm^resstonail
iV4erdl)f paternal {sli d/ 1
(3)Canteie Reav<?nci\0m,te RO use its qrk-Wu,SukfcdtiVe,
discretion incied-vdiriqV/eteraas benefits fdbabHite)£Ums,
@ Fire theVfty twtts/4R<> Bo^5 rules «M.
regulations blnckaa/MUibtbeJ beplWedbwTkeNlft.
X5 tke RO/^^MewsCou^MeraVar^eaeW
respeoitv/eW allowed to "fore Veterans beneFttSip+ho
berate afc shdvtonV Mandated and nonlscreW^
(Sis the narrow lijntfed Unsown of^^Uowmi vete^m
«* C»T^ 1 "f*§ TUIteli co^tinUis fAWi
U CWIew'W+kse^ttef^t^* 5 holies
in Cushwian and HudiaK .
(S) Tkis petitioner contend that the Veteran benefits $\sobili
rights are veru iVnp<yrtentteo tkehonorablu served veterans
and their paraUreS^ public, policy and
States Cbitettlion, fi ftte Araenltnent >
in«S (
in nature..

Are Veterans benefits a property right/interest protected under the United States Constitution, Fifth Amendment?