No. 21-63
Terrance Miles v. Belinda Sanchez, Acting Warden
Tags: evidence evidence-availability government-delay government-responsibility pre-trial-imprisonment prejudice rehabilitation sixth-amendment speedy-trial trial-postponement
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Where a defendant's trial is postponed because certain evidence is unavailable, does the government's responsibility for delays in obtaining that evidence weigh against the government in a Sixth Amendment speedy-trial analysis?
2. Does a defendant suffer prejudice cognizable in a Sixth Amendment speedy-trial analysis where he is imprisoned on a prior conviction and, due to charges he will face in a delayed trial, is confined under more onerous conditions and loses access to rehabilitation opportunities?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government's responsibility for delays in obtaining evidence weighs against the government in a Sixth Amendment speedy-trial analysis
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-05
Reply of petitioner Terrance Miles filed. (Distributed)
2021-10-22
Brief of respondent Belinda Sanchez, Warden in opposition filed.
2021-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 22, 2021.
2021-08-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 22, 2021 to October 22, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-23
Response Requested. (Due September 22, 2021)
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent Scott Jordan, Warden to respond filed.
2021-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Belinda Sanchez, Acting Warden
Stephen Chad Meredith — Office of the Kentucky Attorney General, Respondent
Terrance Miles
Charles Kevin Marshall — Jones Day, Petitioner