Question 1:
A. Do courts of appeal exhibit a pattern and
practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY
ISSUE presented by the Class of disrespected,
unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising
from the underlying institutionalized IRS
record falsification program, and from the open
support thereof by U.S. district judges, and
B. does the pattern/practice violate the
independence and impartiality of the judiciary,
and the due process rights of appellants to
meaningful access to courts?

Question 2:
Do U.S. district judges have power to deny
explicit, sworn §455 recusal motions directed to
magistrates committing acts of apparent misconduct
in support of a party?

Do courts of appeal exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY ISSUE presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by U.S. district judges, and does the pattern/practice violate the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, and the due process rights of appellants to meaningful access to courts?