No. 21-6277
Jordan Adonis Rawls v. Pennsylvania
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-charges criminal-prosecution custodial-interrogation due-process miranda-warnings patterson-v-illinois police-disclosure sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2022-01-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER POLICE, TO PROTECT A PERSON'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, MUST DO MORE THAN ADMINISTER MIRANDA WARNINGS WHEN THE INDIVIDUAL IS SUBJECT TO POLICE CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION AND POLICE DELIBERATELY FAIL TO DISCLOSE THAT CRIMINAL CHARGES HAVE ALREADY BEEN FILED?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether police must do more than administer Miranda warnings when an individual is subject to custodial interrogation and police fail to disclose criminal charges have been filed
Docket Entries
2022-01-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-22
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2021-11-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Jordan Rawls
Edward J. Rymsza III — Miele & Rymsza, P.C., Petitioner
Pennsylvania
Martin L Wade — Lycoming County District Attorney's Office, Respondent